![]() The lavish celebration also signals just how important a male heir is to the realm: If Aemma has a son, peace will likely continue. We get the thematic parallels mentioned previously, as well as a good, old-fashioned Game of Thrones-style tournament. While Aemma's labor and the tourney introducing Criston do not happen at the same time in the books, the choice to bring them together is a smart one. Scenes of fighting, like the brawl between Prince Daemon and Ser Criston Cole, are juxtaposed directly with Queen Aemma's painful labor, hammering home her earlier point to her daughter Rhaenyra that childbirth is a woman's battlefield. The first episode of House of the Dragon is built around two key events: the birth of King Viserys and Queen Aemma's son, and the tournament to celebrate it. It's a good way to keep viewers on their toes, and to keep this adaptation somewhat unpredictable. So while book readers may know the general story arc of House of the Dragon, they won't be able to anticipate some of the more granular, character-focused scenes. Fire & Blood rarely delves into scene-level detail, which means House of the Dragon gets to add new scenes or embellish events that are already in the book. While characters like Mushroom do not figure into House of the Dragon, it will be fascinating to see which course of events House of the Dragon chooses to portray, as it will have to take a definitive stance on some of Fire & Blood's more ambiguous moments.ĭo you need to watch 'Game of Thrones' before 'House of the Dragon'?Īn exciting element that comes with adapting a history book (albeit a fictional one) is the chance to play around within the historical framework. ![]() ![]() Each source gives us a slightly different take on key moments that take place behind closed doors, Rashomon-style, with Mushroom's accounts tending to be the most lascivious and extreme. These sources include conflicting reports from Maesters and Septons, as well as a court jester named Mushroom. Throughout Fire & Blood, Gyldayn discusses his differing sources for his work, especially during the section dealing with the Dance of the Dragons. Fire & Blood is written as a history book by the fictional Archmaester Gyldayn, whereas House of the Dragon is a narrative TV show that adapts only a small portion of the centuries-long history covered in Fire & Blood. ![]() Starting out, the biggest difference between Fire & Blood and House of the Dragon is each work's individual structure. Don't worry, book loyalists: Change can be a good thing, and in House of the Dragon's case, a grand majority of the adaptation choices work to enhance the narrative instead of detract from it.įrom structural differences to missing characters and more, here are the biggest changes House of the Dragon has made so far.Ĭaraxes, my beloved. However, just like with the TV adaptation of Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon makes several changes from the source material in order to make the transition from page to screen. House of the Dragon focuses on the Dance and the events leading up to it, including the rivalry between Princess Rhaenyra Targaryen and Queen Alicent Hightower. Martin's massive fantasy tome Fire & Blood to the small screen.įire & Blood tells the history of House Targaryen as they ruled over Westeros, including events like Aegon's initial conquest and the civil war knowns as the Dance of the Dragons. The Game of Thrones prequel series House of the Dragon is finally here, bringing George R.R.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |